Re: [arm-gnu] wchar_t definition 16bit vs 32bit?

[Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Lu Karl wrote:
> I tried to link objects generated by RealView 3.1 and arm-none-eabi
> (2008q1) with arm-none-eabi-ld but it always reported "conflict
> definition of wchar_t". arm-none-linux-gnueabi works well with RVDS 3.1
> generated objects. It seems RVDS uses 16bit wchar_t (unsigned short)
> while arm-none-eabi uses 32-bit wchar_t. Do you plan to support 16bit
> wchar_t in the future version?

See http://www.codesourcery.com/gnu_toolchains/arm/portal/kbentry103.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(650) 331-3385 x713