Re: [arm-gnu] Possible bug in g++ frontend (G++ Lite arm-2009q1-203)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [arm-gnu] Possible bug in g++ frontend (G++ Lite arm-2009q1-203)



And a bit more..

so it would be enough for me to just define the cc1 rule in the spec file. That seems to be applied both for gcc and g++ and in the correct order. I originally thought that only one of them would be applied for each one respectively as is written in the gcc info docs:

     cc1          Options to pass to the C compiler
     cc1plus      Options to pass to the C++ compiler

I think I'll be able to cope with the spec rules now. Thanks for the help :)

Juha

Kallioinen Juha (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote:
Just rambling here a bit more..

Looks like if I have both the cc1 and cc1plus rules in the specs file, then g++ will apply both of them in this order:

1. cc1
2. user given options
3. cc1plus

If I only have cc1plus rule there, g++ will apply it in this order:

1. user given options
2. cc1plus




--
Juha Kallioinen