Actions
| Post | |
| Subscribe | |
| Unsubscribe |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
- To: Brian Spranger <BSpranger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
- From: 42Bastian <list-bastian.schick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 06:10:12 +0100
Hi Brian > I am working on a product that needs to be IEC-61508 SIL 2 compliant. > The documentation states that the compiler has to be either SIL2 certified > or have been in use on many (3 or more) products without having negative > (or known) issues. > > So my question to everyone is: Has anyone produced a safety related > product using the Sourcery G++ Lite 2009q1-161compiler and a STM32F103RB > processor? We at SCIOPTA were in discussion with TUV about this while certifying our RTOS and it was clearly stated that GCC is not valid. Reasons (also against RealView btw.) were: - missing proven-in-use numbers There are a lot of users for "GCC" but not "known" number. - error/defect information (for a certain build) - some "vague" doubts So we went for IAR (or DIAB in case of PowerPC) But the commercial version of CS might work out. -- 42Bastian + | http://www.sciopta.com | Fastest direct message passing kernel. | IEC61508 certified. +
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
- From: Charles Manning
- Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
- References:
- [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
- From: Brian Spranger
- [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
- Prev by Date: RE: [arm-gnu] doubles display way off in gdb/insight
- Next by Date: [arm-gnu] libstdc++
- Previous by thread: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
- Next by thread: Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
- Index(es):