Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?

• To: arm-gnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
• From: 42Bastian <list-bastian.schick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 15:24:16 +0100

Charles,

>> - missing proven-in-use numbers
>> There are a lot of users for "GCC" but not "known" number.
> 
> This seems a strange way to look at things.
> 
> Sure, nobody knows how many people are using gcc but if you establish a lower 
> acceptable bound then it should be easy to find that number of users.

The problem here is, as you pointed out later in a way: There a many
versions of GCC around. Some pre-built some home-built, but it is hard to
put a finger on it.

Where as for a commercial product (even the "commercial" CS) version, it
is easier to estimate number of products made with a certain version.

> 
> For example, all of Android phones, iphone, Mac OSX, Linux are build with gcc 
> (though not the same versions) and we're only scratching the surface.
                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's the point. And it not only gcc, binutils, libc (or newlib) and
libstdc++ need also to be fixed.


-- 
42Bastian
+
| http://www.sciopta.com
| Fastest direct message passing kernel.
| IEC61508 certified.
+

• References:
  • [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
    • From: Brian Spranger
  • Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
    • From: 42Bastian
  • Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
    • From: Charles Manning

• Prev by Date: [arm-gnu] fatal error in "row_insert": std::runtime_error: Failure to bind on bulk operations, works on x86 windows and linux
• Next by Date: Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
• Previous by thread: Re: [arm-gnu] Compiling Safety Related Systems?
• Next by thread: [arm-gnu] libstdc++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread