Re: [autoconf-conversion] Something to start with

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 05:20:41PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > [I am a little worried.  I ran into what looks like a cache
> > incompatibility; I configured libiberty using 2.50, backed down to the
> > 2.13 configure script, did it again, and got quoting errors in
> > config.cache.  But I can't reproduce it now, so I'm only a little
> > worried.]
> 
> Yup, we know about that.  2.50 might not be usable; we might need some
> other 2.5x that's fixed the cache bug.  Or we might need to disable
> the cache for the interim.

Er, I'm slipping.  Debian for hysterical reasons (really) labels modern
autoconf as "2.50".  It's actually 2.57.

I wouldn't object to disabling the cache for the interim if we had a
bit more momentum than we do now.  I say let's leave it alone unless it
bites again.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer