Actions
| Post | |
| Subscribe | |
| Unsubscribe |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- To: Roland Schwarz <roland.schwarz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 10:00:49 -0700
Roland Schwarz wrote:
Mark Mitchell wrote:PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER is supposed to be a constant-expression (like "-1" or "{ 1, 0 }"), so the initialization will happen before foo is called, typically at program start-up.This was not my question, or concern. I am not asking what is typical, but if it is possible that a standard conforming compiler can suffer from such a race condition.
A standard-conforming compiler, used with a standard-conforming POSIX library, cannot suffer from a race condition in the code that you posted because PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER must be a constant-expression.
-- Mark Mitchell CodeSourcery mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (650) 331-3385 x713
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- From: Roland Schwarz
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- References:
- Initialization of local static mutex
- From: Roland Schwarz
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- From: Roland Schwarz
- Initialization of local static mutex
- Prev by Date: Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- Next by Date: Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- Previous by thread: Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- Next by thread: Re: [c++-pthreads] Initialization of local static mutex
- Index(es):