Actions
 |
Post |
 |
Subscribe |
|
Unsubscribe |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- To: Peter Dimov <pdimov@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:10:57 -0500
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 09:18:46PM +0200, Peter Dimov wrote: > Under the current NPTL implementation, can the cancelation exception be > caught by name (and then rethrown)? If not, are there problems (technical > or otherwise) with giving it a name so it can be caught? The latest state I know of for this question is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28145 -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- From: Peter Dimov
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- From: Peter Dimov
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- References:
- Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- From: Peter Dimov
- Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Prev by Date: Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Next by Date: Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Previous by thread: Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Next by thread: Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Index(es):