Actions
| Post | |
| Subscribe | |
| Unsubscribe |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- To: c++-pthreads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- From: Alexander Terekhov <terekhov@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:07:09 +0100
Peter Dimov wrote: [...] > We are currently discussing, on the c++std-ext reflector, the possible > approaches for a C++ cancelation/retirement/interruption mechanism. So I was > trying to decide whether imposing a requirement that the cancel exception > has a C++ type by which it can be caught is workable and reasonable. It > seems to be both. Don't forget pthread_exit() and longjmp() (there should be a base class ala thread_termination_request for thread cancel and thread exit exceptions). Time to kill ugly forced unwind altogether (getting rid of undefined behavior resulting from "more restricted behavior" for longjmp() would not hurt either). regards, alexander.
- References:
- Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- From: Peter Dimov
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- From: Peter Dimov
- Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Prev by Date: Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Next by Date: Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Previous by thread: Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Next by thread: Re: [c++-pthreads] Does the cancelation exception have a name?
- Index(es):