Actions
| Post | |
| Subscribe | |
| Unsubscribe |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thread-safety definition
- To: c++-pthreads@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: thread-safety definition
- From: David Abrahams <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:08:16 -0500
Mathieu Lacage <Mathieu.Lacage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > hi all, > > It looks like what everyone is trying to achieve here is a way for C++ > authors to write thread-safe libraries. I think you missed something, or maybe the main thing. C++ authors can already write thread-safe libraries. What I'm trying to achieve is to allow existing thread-safe library code that wasn't written with POSIX cancellations in mind to be used easily in a POSIX environment. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Re: thread-safety definition
- From: Mathieu Lacage
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Re: thread-safety definition
- From: Dave Butenhof
- Re: [c++-pthreads] Re: thread-safety definition
- References:
- thread-safety definition
- From: Mathieu Lacage
- thread-safety definition
- Prev by Date: Re: [c++-pthreads] thread-safety definition
- Next by Date: Re: What are the real issues?
- Previous by thread: Re: thread-safety definition
- Next by thread: Re: [c++-pthreads] Re: thread-safety definition
- Index(es):