Re: [c++-pthreads] Re: Explicit catch of forced unwind

• To: Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: [c++-pthreads] Re: Explicit catch of forced unwind
• From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 17:15:04 -0700

Jason Merrill wrote:

>> However, the "accessed in any way" language would also seem to forbid
>> rethrowing the exception (via "throw;").  Did you meant to forbid that?
>> If so, why?
> 
> No, rethrowing does not access the exception, just passes it along. This
> is the same restriction that was already present for foreign exceptions.

OK; in that case, your proposed change seems fine to me.

Does anyone else object?  If nobody speaks up in a week, I'll check the
change into the ABI document.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(650) 331-3385 x713

• References:
  • Re: Explicit catch of forced unwind
    • From: Jason Merrill
  • Re: Explicit catch of forced unwind
    • From: Mark Mitchell
  • Re: Explicit catch of forced unwind
    • From: Jason Merrill

• Prev by Date: Re: Explicit catch of forced unwind
• Next by Date: [c++-pthreads] question about using of malloc / free in pthreads
• Previous by thread: Re: Explicit catch of forced unwind
• Next by thread: [c++-pthreads] question about using of malloc / free in pthreads
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread