[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
mangling examples
- To: cxx-abi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: mangling examples
- From: Alex Samuel <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2000 11:33:11 -0700 (PDT)
Now that substitutions are unconditional (with regards to length of
the substitued text vs the length of the substitution token), these
two should now exhibit substitutions:
_Zrm1X1X Ret? operator%(X, X)
_ZplR1XR1X Ret? operator+(X&, X&)
I think they should be `_Zrm1XS0_' and `_ZplR1XS1_', respectively.
|
