[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
Re: Subobject constructors
- To: cxx-abi@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Subobject constructors
- From: Jim Dehnert <dehnert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2000 01:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The wording in 3.3 about subobject constructors is misleading:
>
> If the not-in-charge constructor calls constructors for base class
> subobjects that do not need construction vtables, the construction
> vtable parameter is not passed to the base class subobject
> constructor, and the base class subobject constructors use their
> complete object vtables for initialization.
>
> This is also true when an in-charge constructor is making the call.
> There is never a need to pass a VTT to a base class subobject that
> doesn't have virtual bases.
See if it looks better now...
Jim
- Jim Dehnert dehnert@xxxxxxx
(650)933-4272
|
