[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
Re: Typos in class-layout algorithm
- To: cxx-abi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Typos in class-layout algorithm
- From: dehnert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Jim Dehnert)
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 16:16:21 -0800 (PST)
> From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The "Non-Virtual-Base Allocation" section in the data layout document
> still contains a couple of typos:
>
> Finally allocate any direct or indirect virtual base classes (except
> the primary base class or any indirect primary base classes) as we did
> non-virtual base classes in step II-1, in inheritance graph
> order. Update sizeof(C) to max (sizeof(C), offset(D)+nvsize(D)). If
> non-empty, also update align(C) and dsize(C) as in II-1.
>
> II-1 is now about bitfields. Why not just say that you should use
> II-2 if the virtual base is non-empty, and II-3 if it is empty?
Because the virtual bases don't update nvsize and nvalign.
Otherwise, I've got your fixes (plus one). Thanks.
> The primary base class has already been allocated in I-3a.
>
> That's now I-2b.
- Jim Dehnert dehnert@xxxxxxx
(650)933-4272
|