[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
Mangling: Special names
- To: cxx-abi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Mangling: Special names
- From: Martin von Loewis <loewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2000 15:46:59 +0100
According to the mangling syntax,
Foo::Foo(int)
would be mangled as
_ZN3FooC1Ei
i.e. the constructor <special-name> would syntactically fit only after
a qualified name. Is this intentional? Likewise, _ZN3Foo3BarTVE would
be the Foo::Bar virtual table.
I don't understand the Th and Tv special names: Instead of a
function-type, would you not need an <name> somewhere? Or even an
<encoding>?
Regards,
Martin
|
