Re: Initializer priorities (Was: IA-64 ABI meeting results)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Initializer priorities (Was: IA-64 ABI meeting results)
- To: Martin von Loewis <loewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Initializer priorities (Was: IA-64 ABI meeting results)
- From: Christophe de Dinechin <ddd@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:31:32 +0000
Martin von Loewis wrote:
>
> To me, this looks like a vendor extension, even though it is supported
> by a number of vendors (in one way or the other). What I don't see is
> the general utility of this facility. Perhaps someone can explain the
> requirements that lead to this extension?
To the best of my understanding, this is also HP's position (both Cary and me).
Regards
Christophe