Re: Initializer priorities (Was: IA-64 ABI meeting results)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Initializer priorities (Was: IA-64 ABI meeting results)



Martin von Loewis wrote:
> 
> To me, this looks like a vendor extension, even though it is supported
> by a number of vendors (in one way or the other). What I don't see is
> the general utility of this facility. Perhaps someone can explain the
> requirements that lead to this extension?

To the best of my understanding, this is also HP's position (both Cary and me).

Regards
Christophe