Re: Construction vtables
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Construction vtables
- To: jason@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Construction vtables
- From: Martin von Loewis <loewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2000 16:01:53 +0100
> I think Colleen answered that question; see issues C-5 and C-6. The
> in-charge [cd]tors would not have a VTT parm; the not-in-charge versions
> would.
Thanks, now I understand - I did not realize that the in-charge
version would not require the VTT.
Martin