Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Name mangling question

[nasgaard@xxxxxxxxxx]

I agree that the mangling you gave is correct for your example, but that is
not the example I gave and it is not the mangling g++ gives for my example.
In my example _Impl is nested inside locale.  The mangling g++ gives is
_ZN6locale5_Impl3fooERS0_.

Demangled this is locale::_Impl::foo(locale::_Impl&)

Howard W. Nasgaard
C++ Compiler Development
e-mail: nasgaard@xxxxxxxxxx
C2/KD2/8200/MKM
905-413-3683
Tie: 969-3683



                                                                                                                                                    
                      loewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx                                                                                                           
                      u-berlin.de (Martin        To:       Howard Nasgaard/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA                                                        
                      v. Löwis)                  cc:       cxx-abi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                                                             
                                                 Subject:  Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Name mangling question                                                 
                      11/27/2002 09:12 AM                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                                    
                                                                                                                                                    



nasgaard@xxxxxxxxxx writes:

> The mangled name you specified would be correct if there was a struct
_Impl
> at namespace scope.  For the function in question we need to mangle the
> type of the parameter which, in my example, is locale::_Impl, a nested
> class.

So you agree that the mangling that g++ generates is correct? If not,
what other mangling would you expect?

Regards,
Martin