 |
|
|
|
Actions
|
|
[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
RE: [Cxx-abi] Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Question about guard variable typ es
- To: "Nelson, Clark" <clark.nelson@xxxxxxxxx>, Martin v. Löwis <martin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "cxx-abi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cxx-abi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Cxx-abi] Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Question about guard variable typ es
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 09:29:44 -0800
--On Friday, December 06, 2002 09:11:18 AM -0800 "Nelson, Clark"
<clark.nelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If we do what you suggest, G++ will have to change. I'd
prefer just to
match G++; there's nothing particularly wrong with "long long" and
there aren't -- yet -- very many non-IPF implementations to
worry about.
In what way do you think G++ would have to change?
It won't -- if we change the ABI to say "long long". Otherwise, it needs
to be changed to explicitly construct a 64-bit type.
Intel, HP?
I can tell that a question is being directed to Intel, but I don't know
what the question actually is. Could you spell it out please?
What type do you use for guard variables in 32-bit mode? In 64-bit mode?
--
Mark Mitchell mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
|
|
