Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Name mangling for explicit overriders

[Daveed Vandevoorde <daveed@xxxxxxx>]

On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 05:04  PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
[...]
> Do you have a sense of how probable it is that this extension will
> actually find its way into the standard?  That estimation seems it like
> it might be persuasive in deciding between (2) and (3).
I would say it is very probable, but I don't think it will be
in the first batch of extensions that will pass.  (Fwiw, the
first batch will probably include decltype(...) and "extern
template".)

I believe Bjarne is in favor of the proposal (it is a refinement
of an idea he worked on with Martin O'Riordan a while back), and
so are some other people I've talked to.  The issues are mostly
syntactic.

        Daveed