[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Name mangling for explicit overriders
- To: Daveed Vandevoorde <daveed@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Name mangling for explicit overriders
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Jul 2003 18:17:33 -0700
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:52, Daveed Vandevoorde wrote:
> On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 05:04 PM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> [...]
> > Do you have a sense of how probable it is that this extension will
> > actually find its way into the standard? That estimation seems it like
> > it might be persuasive in deciding between (2) and (3).
>
> I would say it is very probable, but I don't think it will be
> in the first batch of extensions that will pass.
In that case, I guess it makes sense to standardize it. At worst, we
are giving a way a little piece of the mangling namespace -- and there
is plenty more of it if we need it for something.
Does anyone object?
If not, Daveed, would you like to send me a patch for the ABI document?
(Such a patch would presumably note that this mangling is an extension
and its origin.)
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CodeSourcery, LLC
|