Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Re: A complexity in the mangling ABI

[Ian Lance Taylor <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jim Dehnert <dehnert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> What I recall the ABI intended to convey, though obviously it
> isn't clear enough, was that order-insensitive vendor qualifiers
> were to be treated just like the predefined qualifiers const and
> volatile.

It does more or less convey that impression.

The problem, from the demangler perspective, is that the demangler
can't tell which vendor qualifiers are order-insensitive and which are
order-sensitive.  Thus any difference in behaviour between the two,
particularly in how they substitute, is a problem for the demangler.

Ian