Re: [cxx-abi-dev] C++0x: mangling of char16_t and char32_t

[David Vandevoorde <daveed@xxxxxxx>]

On Mar 25, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Dennis Handly wrote:
> > From: "Doug Gregor" <doug.gregor@xxxxxxxxx>
> > We don't have a mangling for the C++0x char16_t or char32_t types. It
> > has been suggested that we use 'k' for char16_t and 'q' for char32_t.
> > Does that seem reasonable?
> I was thinking for HP-UX, char32_t would be the same as wchar_t.

It can be the same type from a back end perspective, but in C++ you  
can overload based on those types:
	void f(wchar_t);   // (!)
	void f(char32_t);  // Different from (1)

So distinct encodings are needed.

	Daveed