Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Mangling late-specified return types/decltype

[Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Lawrence Crowl wrote:
> On 9/5/08, Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Consider
> >
> >  template<class T, class U>
> >  auto add(T t, U u) -> decltype (t+u);
> >
> > There is currently no way to mangle "t" in the ABI.  Currently I'm dealing
> > this by replacing "t" in the return type with *(T*)0, but that seems
> > inelegant (and unnecessarily long).
> Are you suggesting the mangling of the template itself or of its instances?
> For the latter, shouldn't we be using the regular mangling?
The mangling of specializations is basically the mangling of the 
template plus the template arguments.  This is done to distinguish 
between instantiations of different templates that have the same 
function signature.
Jason