Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Deleted virtual functions
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Deleted virtual functions
- To: cxx-abi-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Deleted virtual functions
- From: David Vandevoorde <daveed@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:40:57 -0400
Attached are proposed diffs.
I noticed that there isn't actually a requirement to point virtual
table entried for pure virtual functions at __cxa_pure_virtual. Is
that intentional or just sloppy wording?
Daveed
Attachment:
deleted_funcs.diffs
Description: Binary data