Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A mangling for std::nullptr_t

[Lawrence Crowl <crowl@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 9/21/09, Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/18/2009 09:58 PM, Dennis Handly wrote:
> > > From: David Vandevoorde<daveed@xxxxxxx>
> > > decltype(nullptr) maybe, or std::nullptr_t
> > > (although the latter is typedef).
> >
> > Yes, that's why I didn't suggest the latter.
>
> That doesn't really seem like a problem to me.  The Dn mangling
> sounds good.

Personally, I'd go with the decltype.  Following the standard can
rarely be wrong, even if it is ... odd.

-- 
Lawrence Crowl