CodeSourcery > List Archives

Actions

	Post
	Subscribe
	Unsubscribe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [pooma-dev] missing reductions

To: <pooma-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [pooma-dev] missing reductions
From: "Allan Stokes" <allan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 08:22:00 -0800

In benchmarks/Solvers/Jacobi/JacobiInP2.h there is this comment:

  // Since we don't have reductions yet, do this by hand.

The hand-wrought code looks like a simple nine-point stencil reduction with
multiplicative co-efficients for each cell.  It doesn't look like something
that Pooma couldn't implement.

Is there a technical reason this operation is not yet provided?

Allan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [pooma-dev] missing reductions
  - From: Stephen A. Smith

References:
- Re: [pooma-dev] RFA: Fix Utilities Typos and Prevent Warnings
  - From: James Crotinger

Prev by Date: RE: [pooma-dev] RFA: Fix Utilities Typos and Prevent Warnings
Next by Date: RE: [pooma-dev] allocation assert
Previous by thread: Re: [pooma-dev] RFA: Fix Utilities Typos and Prevent Warnings
Next by thread: Re: [pooma-dev] missing reductions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread