Re: [PATCH] don't bench too much for boundschecking

["Jeffrey D. Oldham" <oldham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Richard Guenther wrote:

> This reduces particle benchmarking if POOMA_BOUNDS_CHECK is on
> to one time with 100 particles (it takes an awful lot of time).
>
> Ok?
>
> Richard.
>
>
> 2004Aug27  Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> 	* src/Particles/tests/particle_tests.h: for POOMA_BOUNDS_CHECK
> 	reduce default problem size(s).
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Index: Particles/tests/particle_tests.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/pooma/Repository/r2/src/Particles/tests/particle_tests.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.22
> diff -u -u -r1.22 particle_tests.h
> --- Particles/tests/particle_tests.h	23 Aug 2004 18:44:17 -0000	1.22
> +++ Particles/tests/particle_tests.h	27 Aug 2004 15:45:38 -0000
> @@ -400,8 +400,13 @@
>   // Default parameters for the benchmark.
>
>   int iters = 1000;
> +#if POOMA_BOUNDS_CHECK
> +  int startnumparticles = 100;
> +  int endnumparticles = 100;
> +#else
>   int startnumparticles = 100;
>   int endnumparticles = 10000;
> +#endif
>   int multnumparticles = 10;
>   double movefrac = 0.1;
>   bool usesync = false;
>  
I appreciate the desire to reduce the running time when bounds checking 
occurs, but this new set of values ensures the loop runs only once.  
Without the change, the loop runs three times.  It would be nice to have 
the loop run at least twice to ensure it does not break something when 
the loop counter is updated.  To do this, set endnumparticles to 1000 
when bounds are checked.  A more complex change is to change 
'endnumparticles' to 'startnumparticles * multnumparticles' and reducing 
'multnumparticles' to a smaller value greater than one.
--
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx