 |
|
|
|
Actions
|
|
[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
Re: [qmtest] Specifying arguments in derived test classes
- To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@xxxxxxxxx>, "qmtest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <qmtest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [qmtest] Specifying arguments in derived test classes
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 08:08:18 -0700
--On Friday, April 12, 2002 05:19:05 PM +0400 Vladimir Prus
<ghost@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to create a test class that would derive from python.ExecTest
and change it a little. In particular, I want to get rid of 'expession'
argument. I'm trying the following:
class Test(python.ExecTest):
arguments = [
qm.fields.TextField(
name="source",
title="Python Source Code",
description="""The source code.
This code may contain class definitions, function
definitions, statements, and so forth. If this code
throws an uncaught exception, the test will fail.""",
verbatim="true",
multiline="true",
default_value="pass"
)
]
def __init__(self, **properties):
apply(python.ExecTest.__init__, (self,), properties)
self.expression = None
def Run(self, context, result):
# Not relevant here
However, I get a test class with three arguments: two defined in
python.ExecTest and one defined in my class. How can I accomplish what I
want?
There's no easy way to do this.
The plan is to add "computed arguments" which would solve this problem.
For the time being, you have no real choice but to create a whole new
class.
(At one point, it was possible to do approximately what you wanted;
each class could completely override "arguments". We decided this was
a bad design since that meant that derived classes had to explicitly
list the arguments from the base classes, and there was no guarantee
that the "is-a" relationship would be preserved.)
--
Mark Mitchell mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
|
|