 |
|
|
|
Actions
|
|
[ Date Prev][ Date Next][ Thread Prev][ Thread Next][ Date Index][ Thread Index]
Re: [vsipl++] [patch] Document div, mul, and sub elementwise functions
- To: VSIPL++ Developers List <vsipl++@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [vsipl++] [patch] Document div, mul, and sub elementwise functions
- From: Mike LeBlanc <Mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2008 10:32:00 -0400
On Aug 6, 2008, at 10:25 AM, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
Yes, that's precisely what I suggest. As far as I'm concerned,
please check it in. (Mark, is anybody in the GNU Toolchain group
using functionsynopsis ? Does this change affect you at all ?)
Yesterday I stumbled on a similar tag <classsynopsis>, and related
children, for OO languages. Is anyone using this already for C++?
- References:
- [vsipl++] [patch] Document div, mul, and sub elementwise functions
- Re: [vsipl++] [patch] Document div, mul, and sub elementwise functions
- Re: [vsipl++] [patch] Document div, mul, and sub elementwise functions
- Re: [vsipl++] [patch] Document div, mul, and sub elementwise functions
- Re: [vsipl++] [patch] Document div, mul, and sub elementwise functions
|
|