Re: [arm-gnu] missing 'packed' warning?

[Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Galen Seitz wrote:

> While experimenting with packed structures, I've encountered a possible
> problem.  With the following code, the declaration of test2 does not
> cause a compiler warning, but the structure is not packed.  Is this a
> bug, or am I misinterpreting something?

> struct __attribute__ ((packed)) foo test2; /* No warning, but not
> packed. */

Yes, I believe that's a defect in that the warning should be issued
there too.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(650) 331-3385 x713