Re: [arm-gnu] zeroing out the .bss area
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [arm-gnu] zeroing out the .bss area
- To: arm-gnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [arm-gnu] zeroing out the .bss area
- From: Charles Manning <manningc2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 12:10:30 +1300
Correction. There was a missing NOT in my last posting.
On Wednesday 04 November 2009 11:02:24 Mark Mitchell wrote:
> JJ wrote:
> > So as long as I don't expect unintialized global and statically
> > allocated variables to be 0, I'm fine?
>
> Yes.
No. That is NOT entirely correct.
A statically allocated variable that is initialised to zero will end up in bss
too.
int foo=1; // .data
int bar=0; // .bss
int uninitilised_var; //.bss