Re: thread-safety definition

[David Abrahams <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ted Baker <baker@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Except for the fact that we have normally-non-throwing functions that
>> have started to throw, I don't think anyone's disagreeing with you.
>
> This still perplexes me.  How does a "normally-non-throwing function"
> "start to throw"?

You port the code which calls the function into an environment which
changes the rules about what can throw exceptions.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com