Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Mangling sizeof

[David Vandevoorde <daveed@xxxxxxx>]

On Mar 11, 2009, at 3:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:

> Doug Gregor wrote:
> > I'd prefer the introduction of a mangling for "function parameter N".
>
> I was thinking that to handle local classes, such a mangling will  
> need to indicate which function the parameter belongs to.  But I  
> guess that isn't really necessary since we can't have a template  
> with a signature inside a function.
>
> So, how about a mangling like that for template parms, but starting  
> with "fp" rather than "T"?

Sounds good to me.  This will be a new case for <operator-name>, right?

	Daveed