Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A mangling for std::nullptr_t
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A mangling for std::nullptr_t
- To: Dennis Handly <dhandly@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [cxx-abi-dev] A mangling for std::nullptr_t
- From: Jason Merrill <jason@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 12:50:14 -0500
On 03/04/2010 10:06 PM, Dennis Handly wrote:
From: Jason Merrill<jason@xxxxxxxxxx>
I meant it matches except for the _ZTI prefix:
_ZTIl == type info of long
How is "l" == "__fundamental_type_info"?
_ZTIl (for long) is an object whose type is __fundamental_type_info.
Yes. I still don't see the distinction between that and
_ZTIDn (for std::nullptr_t) is an object whose type is __nullptr_type_info.
I understand your argument that we don't need a new type, I was just
confused by the talk about a mismatch between the type and the mangled name.
Jason