RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
- To: "'oldham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oldham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, pooma-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
- From: James Crotinger <jcrotinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:56:50 -0600
We do use compilers that don't put C functions in std::. I think both SGI CC
and VC++ have .h-less C headers, but don't put the C functions in std::. The
.h-less C header files are standard conforming and at least prior to the 2.4
project our rule was to use these since they were more portable.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Oldham [mailto:oldham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 8:23 AM
> To: pooma-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
>
>
>
> For Pooma, what compilers are we supporting? In particular,
> are we supporting any compilers did not recognize the standard
> '.h'-less header filenames?
>
> Right now, the code uses both deprecated and standard header
> filenames.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeffrey D. Oldham
> oldham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>