RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
- To: James Crotinger <jcrotinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'oldham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oldham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "pooma-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pooma-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
- From: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 20:25:23 -0000
--On Friday, September 28, 2001 9:56 AM -0600 James Crotinger
<jcrotinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We do use compilers that don't put C functions in std::. I think both SGI
CC and VC++ have .h-less C headers, but don't put the C functions in
std::. The .h-less C header files are standard conforming and at least
prior to the 2.4 project our rule was to use these since they were more
portable.
I think that's a good policy: do not assume `std', but do assume that
.h-less headers exist.
-- Mark