Re: [arm-gnu] Is arm-2009q1-203-arm-none-linux-gnueabi version support for ARM architecture v7(armv7)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [arm-gnu] Is arm-2009q1-203-arm-none-linux-gnueabi version support for ARM architecture v7(armv7)
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [arm-gnu] Is arm-2009q1-203-arm-none-linux-gnueabi version support for ARM architecture v7(armv7)
- From: nagaraju goruganti <nagaraju.goruganti@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 20:06:41 +0530
Thanks for reply,
No problem. Please tell me what modifications i need to do ?
I have tried by giving "--with-arch=armv7-a" in gcc configuration and I
built successfully,but i don't know that was correct or not. It is mentioned
at http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html .
But ,after that modification,If I build any application ,without/with giving
any extra flags(i.e -macrh=XXX),and if see the File Attributes ,it is always
showing same thing.
Is it means that It is always building for architect armv7-a ?
*
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-readelf -A a.out*
*
Tag_CPU_name: "7-A"
Tag_CPU_arch: v7
Tag_CPU_arch_profile: Application
Tag_ARM_ISA_use: Yes
Tag_THUMB_ISA_use: Thumb-2
Tag_ABI_PCS_wchar_t: 4
Tag_ABI_FP_denormal: Needed
Tag_ABI_FP_exceptions: Needed
Tag_ABI_FP_number_model: IEEE 754
Tag_ABI_align8_needed: Yes
Tag_ABI_enum_size: int
*
Please, tell me what other modifications I need to do?
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Mark Mitchell <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> nagaraju goruganti wrote:
>
> > but I want to change tool chain, so that by default it will build for
> > -mcpu=cortex-a8 -march=armv7-a -mtune=cortex-a8. without giving these
> > options.
>
> You can do that, by rebuilding from the source code we provide. You
> will have to make some modifications to the compiler source code to make
> this work the way you want. And, then you will have to go through the
> build process which is complex. And, unless you have a lot of test
> infrastructure set up, you will not be able to validate the resulting
> tools as well as we do, so it will be hard for you to know that what you
> get will really work. That all sounds like a lot of work relative to a
> wrapper script, but it certainly is possible if that's what you want to do.
>
> --
> Mark Mitchell
> CodeSourcery
> mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (650) 331-3385 x713
>
--
Regards
Nagaraju G