Re: [cxx-abi-dev] Proposed ABI changes for new C++0x SFINAE rules

[John McCall <rjmccall@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Aug 18, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 08/18/2010 03:09 PM, John McCall wrote:
>> Is there anything specifically saying that we mangle operator names based on the deduced arity from a call site?
> 
> Not that I've noticed.  I think the unary mangling is just for expression uses.

Okay.  So we're in agreement that '+x' is mangled with 'ps', but 'operator+(x)'
is 'pl' regardless of the number of arguments?

John.